Integrations

Connect conversations to approved business actions

Give the agent narrow, explicit tools instead of broad access. Start with read checks and structured outputs, then add confirmed write actions where they are justified.

6 detailed topics English content

Integrations

An integration should make the next step clearer

Telp tools have an explicit description, input contract and permission policy. Credentials stay on the server, while operators can see what was attempted and where a workflow needs attention.

Explicit inputs

The agent collects structured fields instead of sending an uncontrolled conversation blob.

Controlled actions

Read checks, drafts and write actions can have different confirmation requirements.

Visible failures

A failed integration remains visible for review instead of silently pretending the action worked.

Integrations

Choose the simplest reliable connection

Automation platforms are useful for a fast pilot. Native or direct server integrations fit flows that need stronger identity, authorization, product context or lifecycle control.

  • What data the agent needs to read
  • Which actions change business state
  • Who must confirm sensitive writes
  • How failures reach the responsible team

FAQ

Questions before you choose

How much access does Integrations receive?

Only the specific operations and fields exposed through approved tools. A connection does not give the agent unrestricted access to the underlying system.

Can write actions require a person to confirm them?

Yes. Sensitive operations can remain structured drafts until the platform receives explicit confirmation.

What happens when an integration fails?

The action is not presented as successful. Technical detail remains available in operational logs or debug surfaces, while the customer receives an appropriate next step.

Not sure where to start?

Share the channels you use and the customer work that repeats most often. We will suggest one focused first workflow.